In this paper I examine the ways in which the weaknesses and strengths of Plutarch’s
Banquet of the Seven Sages are tied to Plutarch’s attempt to recreate the world of the sixth
century BCE in fictional form. The awkwardness of the first half of the dialogue stems from
the incommensurability between the symposiastic genre of the Banquet and the Sages’ role
as ‘performers of wisdom’ and their noted brevity of speech, or brachulogia. It is only when
Plutarch stops trying to historicize in the second half of the dialogue (and shifts his focus away
from the Sages altogether) that it becomes more readable, literary, and Plutarchan. This disparity
reflects a broader tension between archaic brachulogia, and the less definitive, ambivalent, and
voluble style of discourse Plutarch favored, and I suggest that the Banquet stages its own internal
dialogue between alternative modes of representing the past.