The relation between Trimalchio and his slaves in the Satyricon,
given its detailed analysis, becomes a unique example of the treatment that the
freedmen of the first century A.D. used to give to their ancient equals. It allows,
also, the delineation of a more precise idea about the parvenu's philanthropy:
almost all sympathetic attitudes toward his slaves are dictated by the host’s
obsession with the monopolization of the conversations, with the astonishment
of the guests through staged intermezzi and with his own death. That’s why, in
this respect, Trimalchio’s humanitas presents obvious limitations. Considered in
its formal and structural perspective, the parody of Seneca’s Ep. 47.1, in Petr.
71.1, confirms the absence of urbanitas - traditional part and constituent of the
humanitas -, and the Petronian concern, when drawing his character, with the
obedience to the Aristotelian and Horadan principle of appropriateness. In its
ideological and contextual frame, this parody implies three deeply different
persons: one tries to conciliate Stoic philosophy with political and social
concerns; the other, Trimalchio, not dispelling means, exhibits his egocentrism;
and the third one, Petronius, in a very discrete death fiction, shows perhaps his
disbelief in human capacity of making long-term projects and in trying to
improve such an unstable and unfair world like the Roman one of the first
century A.D.